Unfortunately, It's a bit late for Halloween, and too many of the pictures are a bit dark :-( I was trying to add a bit of drama with the camera angles.... hmmmm.
Everyone's quick to blame the alien.
- Aeschylus
This is the blog of Shockwave Plasma, a virtual entity who originated in Second Life. Being a virtual person lets me look out into the real world from a different perspective.
The Age also reported earlier this month that a senior police investigator had told victims of a suspected Catholic paedophile of his ''grave'' concerns that his investigation into their alleged abuser was being derailed and that ''pro-church police members'' might have interfered in his inquiry.Can you imagine that! Members of the Police force interfering with an investigation into the Catholic Church. Please, also note it's hearsay, and includes the word "might". Of course on Sunday morning, Policeman goes to church......has a bit of a chat with the priest....
In a pastoral letter dated 1 July 2010 Archbishop Denis Hart said that 300
complaints had been dealt with in the Melbourne Archdiocese Response
process, an in-house sexual abuse complaints process. It seems that not one
of these was referred to the police.
I know this because recently the Victorian Police have criticised the Archdiocese of Melbourne for not eliciting the assistance of the police or referring allegations of sexual abuse for investigation, despite requests by the police to do so. Denis Hart has said that the 300 complaints related to 60 priests in the Melbourne Archdioceses.
Think about that for a moment: Sixty different priests in Melbourne are allegedto have committed sexual offences. There are at least 300 people who report being victims - these are just the matters that have been reported within the Archdiocese of Melbourne. Some individual victims have reported to the police, but the Church has not taken this initiative.
I know of no other community group, school, business, company, government agency or volunteer organisation who could preside over such astonishing and horrifying statistics and yet consider themselves to be above the law or somehow separate to it. Any responsible CEO of a company, the president of a football or social club or the manager of a community group would seek the assistance of the police to investigate known or suspected criminal activity of such a scale.
Good Thinking will be awarding The Golden Duck each year to the person (or organisation) that has supported or practiced pseudoscience in the most ludicrous, dangerous, irrational or irresponsible manner. The decision is based on nominations by the public, followed by short listing and then finally a vote among skeptic groups.
The award will have different criteria each year, and for our first outing we have decided to offer a lifetime achievement award open for any quack from any discipline – the winner may come from medical quackery, or indeed politics, business, TV and media and beyond.
What is the difference between USCIRF and the State Department’s Office of International Religious Freedom?
USCIRF is an independent, bipartisan federal government entity, while the Office of International Religious Freedom (IRF) — also established under IRFA—is part of the U.S. State Department. Both USCIRF and the State Department release annual reports on international religious freedom, but each has different purposes. The State Department's report documents religious freedom violations in every country in the world. USCIRF’s Annual Report, by statute, recommends countries to be designated as “countries of particular concern” which the Executive Branch must consider. The report also examines select countries, and while also documenting abuses, makes policy recommendations to the executive and legislative branches of government. USCIRF’s report also comments on the effectiveness of the State Department’s efforts to promote international religious freedom.
I can't see anything about public information, only that the Government will see these reports.What's the latest on reporting?
Although the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) legislation is still being finalised, it is expected that the following reporting obligations will apply.
For the 2012-13 reporting period, all registered charities will be expected to report basic information about their operations (non-financial only) (annual information statement).
For the 2013-14 reporting period onwards, registered charities will be expected to provide annual information statements, for:
This two-stage approach follows from the 17 May 2012 announcement from the Assistant Treasurer (The Hon. David Bradbury MP) and the Minister for Social Inclusion (The Hon. Mark Butler MP). It will allow more time for additional public consultation on the proposed financial reporting framework.
- small charities – report basic information about their operations and finances
- medium and large charities – report more detailed information (financial and non-financial) about their operations, including financial reports.
After the requirements are finalised, the ACNC will provide guidance about reporting obligations to help charities understand their obligations in a timely way.